| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.11 - 09 Dec 2006 - RichardPrestage) |
| Changed: | |||
| < < | %META:TOPICPARENT{name="AstActiveSurfaceGeneralStrategy"}% | ||
| > > | %META:TOPICPARENT{name="ActiveSurfaceGeneralStrategy"}% | ||
| Changed: | |||
| < < |
| ||
| > > |
| ||
| Added: | |||
| > > | This page is out of date. OOF Holography corrections should automatically be enabled when you enable Zernike coefficients. See Richard Prestage for more details. | ||
| Added: | |||
| > > | %META:TOPICMOVED{by="RichardPrestage" date="1165687048" from="PTCS.AstActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures" to="PTCS.ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures"}% | ||
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.10 - 03 Nov 2005 - BojanNikolic) |
| Changed: | |
| < < | Once testing has been completed an example script will be placed here. |
| > > |
|
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.9 - 19 Oct 2005 - BojanNikolic) |
| Changed: | |
| < < | procedure. Since calibrator sources are typically withing ten degrees |
| > > | procedure. Since calibrator sources are typically within ten degrees |
| Changed: | |
| < < |
Using the
|
| > > |
Accessing the
|
| Added: | |
| > > |
Typical usage of
|
| Added: | |
| > > |
The surface corrections derived from OOF observations have been
evaluated at 5 degree elevation intervals and are relatively
smooth. Therefore, changes of elevation of less than 5 degrees
certainly do not require updating the corrections applied to the
active surface, but we would recommend updates for elevation changes
of 10 degrees or more.
In a scenario where the observer is switching between widely separated
sources, we recommend updates after each slew to the source.
In a scenario that a source is being tracked as it raises/sets, we
recommend updates when the source elevation changes by more than five
degrees. This implies that duration of the track commands should not
be excessively long so as to allow them to be interleaved with the
ZernikeModel() commands.
Calling the update command ZernikeModel() should take
very little time and no problems should arise from calling this
command too often.
Usage exampleOnce testing has been completed an example script will be placed here. |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.8 - 19 Oct 2005 - BojanNikolic) |
| Changed: | |
| < < | surface. Documentation on how to do this will be here shortly. |
| > > |
surface, using a new observing procedure ZernikeModel.
The
The |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.7 - 14 Oct 2005 - RichardPrestage) |
| Added: | |
| > > | # Import general modules import os import sys |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.6 - 13 Oct 2005 - BojanNikolic) |
| Added: | |
| > > |
Applying corrections in a more accurate (and intrusive) mannerTheAutoPeakFocuss2 procedure applies corrections
appropriate to the elevation of the calibrator source selected by the
procedure. Since calibrator sources are typically withing ten degrees
on the sky of the source being observed the elevation selected in this
way is approximately right. The shortcomings of this approach are that
the differences in elevation of the source and calibrator may in fact
be significant, and that corrections are updated only every time an
AutoPeakFocuss2 is executed.
Both of these shortcomings can be resolved by modifying users'
observing scripts to explicitly update the correction to the active
surface. Documentation on how to do this will be here shortly. |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.5 - 10 Oct 2005 - DanaBalser) |
| Changed: | |
| < < | By analysing the OOF measurements we have produced a model of for the |
| > > | By analysing the OOF measurements we have produced a model for the |
| Changed: | |
| < < | displacements of actuators. |
| > > | actuator displacements. |
| Deleted: | |
| < < | |
| Deleted: | |
| < < | |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.4 - 09 Oct 2005 - BojanNikolic) |
| Changed: | |
| < < |
Out-of-focus (OOF) holography observations have been used to adjust
the surface as a function of elevation using Zernike polynomials that
can be dialed into the active surface control. Currently, these
models are connected to the observing procedure
|
| > > |
Out-Of-Focus (OOF) holography observations have been used to measure
total aberrations in the GBT optical system as a function of
elevation. Due to the nature of these observations, it is not possible
to determine how much of the aberrations arise from deformation of the
primary surface as compared to elsewhere in the optical system. The
aberrations can, however, be effectively compensated by adjusting the
figure of the primary reflector using the active surface.
By analysing the OOF measurements we have produced a model of for the
aberrations as a function of elevation. The models are currently
stored as sets of disk files which contain the corrections to be
applied at specific elevations. The corrections themselves are
parameterized as coefficients of Zernike's circle polynomials; a
section of the telescope M&C system turns these coefficients into
displacements of actuators.
Applying correctionsThe corrections can be applied in a largely user-transparent way through the use of the observing procedureAutoPeakFocus2
. This procedure is very similar to AutoPeakFocus
(see ScanTypes), except that three parameters have been
added:
AutoPeakFocuss2 to be used without any further
modification in scripts which made use of
AutoPeakFocuss. The default values for the parameters
are: (1) the current telescope position for loc; (2) to configure the
telescope; and (3) not to apply any Zernike model. Attached below is
an example scheduling block using AutoPeakFocuss2.
Accessing the
The |
| Changed: | |
| < < | nighttime under benign conditions. During the day similar observations revealed large distortions that appeared to be astigmatism. Large local pointing corrections (LPCs) were also measured during the day. Preliminary tests indicate that these distortion are not caused by deformations in the primary surface but are caused by sub-reflector collimation. We are developing procedures that allow the user to perform LPCs observations during the day that will use the sub-reflector to correct for these distortions, which appear to be a collimation problem, thereby improving the aperture efficiency and the pointing. |
| > > | night under benign conditions. Similar observations made during the day reveal relatively large aberrations, mostly in the form of astigmatism. Large local pointing corrections (LPCs, that is, the difference between expected telescope pointing including the pointing model and actual telescope pointing) are also typically measured during the day. Some preliminary tests indicate that the aberrations found during the day are not by and large caused by deformations in the primary surface but are predominantly caused by collimation errors due to mis-positioning of the sub-reflector. We are developing procedures to allow the user to implement local pointing corrections through adjustment of the sub-reflector position rather than offsetting the entire telescope. In this way we expect to correct the pointing and simultaneously improve collimation leading to improved overall aperture efficiency during the day. |
| Added: | |
| > > |
Sample observing script |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.3 - 07 Oct 2005 - DanaBalser) |
| Changed: | |
| < < |
to |
| > > |
to |
| Changed: | |
| < < | |
| > > | The OOF holography observations discussed above were made during the nighttime under benign conditions. During the day similar observations revealed large distortions that appeared to be astigmatism. Large local pointing corrections (LPCs) were also measured during the day. Preliminary tests indicate that these distortion are not caused by deformations in the primary surface but are caused by sub-reflector collimation. We are developing procedures that allow the user to perform LPCs observations during the day that will use the sub-reflector to correct for these distortions, which appear to be a collimation problem, thereby improving the aperture efficiency and the pointing. |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.2 - 06 Oct 2005 - DanaBalser) |
| Added: | |
| > > |
Out-of-focus (OOF) holography observations have been used to adjust
the surface as a function of elevation using Zernike polynomials that
can be dialed into the active surface control. Currently, these
models are connected to the observing procedure
|
| Added: | |
| > > | %META:FILEATTACHMENT{name="ZernikePeak.sb" attr="h" comment="" date="1128627391" path="ZernikePeak.sb" size="698" user="DanaBalser" version="1.1"}% |
| <<O>> Difference Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures (r1.1 - 05 Oct 2005 - DanaBalser) |
| Added: | ||||
| > > |
%META:TOPICINFO{author="DanaBalser" date="1128538560" format="1.0" version="1.1"}%
%META:TOPICPARENT{name="AstActiveSurfaceGeneralStrategy"}%
Active Surface - Observing Procedures
| |||
| Topic ActiveSurfaceObservingProcedures . { View | Diffs | r1.11 | > | r1.10 | > | r1.9 | More } |
|
Revision r1.1 - 05 Oct 2005 - 18:56 GMT - DanaBalser Revision r1.11 - 09 Dec 2006 - 18:00 GMT - RichardPrestage |
Content copyright © 1999-2007 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. |