. Usually, there is a set of these registers for each of two polarizations.
Note the term
accounts for the increase in Tsys caused by the noise tube calibration signal, which is on half of the time.
Where
is the calibration temperature of the noise tube calibration signal, usually available from engineering measurements, and is a function of frequency (f) and polarization (p). Note system temperature is also, then, a function of frequency and polarization. For many observing scenarios, a single value of system temperature can be applied across the entire bandwidth observed, and so system temperature is a single scalar value for each polarization:
, where the average is across frequencies (or spectral channels). If large bandwidths are used it is sometimes necessary to maintain the frequency dependence, but to avoid introducing noise it is necessary to smooth the Tsys spectrum before using it later in the calibration process. See the calibration documentation for details.
Next, the observer can generate antenna temperature as follows:
where sig and ref are both functions of frequency, and can be defined in one simple case by
and
.
Next the observer may wish to convert the antenna temperature to flux density in Janskies. This can be accomplished either by applying telescope-specific parameters, or by observing a known astronomical flux calibrator.
Using known telescope parameters:
where K is a constant depending on the telescope (K = 2.8 for the GBT),
is the aperture efficiency at the frequency and elevation of interest,
is the spillover factor, typically
~ 0.99,
is the atmospheric opacity at the zenith, and elv is the elevation observed.
Using astronomical calibrators: Observe the calibrator using the identical observing configuration, and calculate the scaling factor as follows:
. Then scale the data accordingly. Keep in mind that if the elevation of the calibration source differs from that of the source of interest, the gain will be different and must be corrected. Both aperture efficency and opacity factors must be compensated.
The final result of this step is a spectrum in units of K or Jy. However, it is often the case that an unknown offset and baseline shape remains in the spectrum. It will be accounted for in a later step.
Here,
represents the value of the frequency switch. Note that after folding the edges of the bandpass must be flagged or blanked to account for those channels that do not have both a signal and reference measurement.
) or it can be done by hand (tedious, but often necessary).
. Another weighting option is to calculate an rms for each spectrum to be averaged, and weight according to rms.
The final spectrum can also be averaged in frequency. This is often accomplished either by applying a Hanning smoothing function, or a boxcar smoothing function.
| Topic HowToReduceFSTrackData . { Edit | Attach | Ref-By | Printable | Diffs | r1.3 | > | r1.2 | > | r1.1 | More } |
|
Revision r1.3 - 07 Dec 2005 - 19:27 GMT - JimBraatz Parents: PlanOfRecordC42004 > StandardObservingModes |
Content copyright © 1999-2007 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. |